Fisherless RN
Return to Commonwealth Navy:
I have done a lot of drawings lately for the Royal Navy with the premise that
Lord Fisher did not make it back to the Admiralty in 1914 and so the building
program of the Royal Navy is completely different for WW1. That would also make
the post-WW1 Washington Naval Treaty a different set of ships to be retained
through to WW2. This AU will allow me to put all these drawings into one thread
and let me fill in the gaps with the ships and ship types that could make up
this different future.
As noted in another thread: Admiral Fisher sidetracked the two R class into
Repulse and Renown, and ordered the three Courageous class. That was a total of
approximately 120,000 tons. For Great Britain it is not the shipbuilding
capacity that gets strained it is the ability to provide the steel required by
the shipbuilding industry that is the limiting factor on how much can be built.
For my Fisherless world the three Barfleur Class are going to take 105,000 tons
of that amount. Leaves 15,000 to put toward whatever was next. The four Admiral
class were next in the list of capital ship building projects. Initially at
36,000 tons each that would have been 144,000 tons of steel. Add the 15,000 to
that figure and we end up with about 160,000, which is just nice to build my
four ship Majestic Class. So what happens to the CV conversions of the ugly
sisters, I hear you ask? They get replaced with two Majestic class conversions.
The fourth ship is cancelled.
With the completion of Majestic in 1920, a decision was to be made as to what
would happen with the three uncompleted ships. Two were at 75% and 80% complete
but their construction had been halted in 1918. With the convening of the
Washington conference their future became even more problematic. The fourth unit
was only 40% complete and the decision was taken to scrap it as the funds to
complete it would be hard to come by. As we know now the Washington Naval Treaty
had a far reaching affect on warship production for years to come.
But what does that do to my Fisherless Royal Navy. In real life the Royal Navy
ends up with 5 Royal Sovereign, 5 Queen Elizabeth, 2 Renown, and Hood. The two
Nelson class yet to be built. In my FRN the 2 Renowns and Hood disappear and
Tiger is the last of the battlecruisers. With the three Barfleur class, Majestic
and three possible sisters something has to give. Is the RN likely to try to get
an extra ship through? Would the WNT allow the RN 5xR, 5xQE, 3 Barfleur,
Majestic, then the 2 Nelsons to be built? Keep the Tiger as the training ship.
Would the RN be willing to sacrifice an 'R' if it was neccessary.
The WNT was not good news for the Majestic's sisters, the WNT would not allow
them to be completed as battleships. The new-fangled type of ships to carry
wheeled aircraft were their saviour. While they could not be completed as
battleships they could be converted to aircraft carriers. The RN had been
trialling these ships with the Cavendish/Vindictive , Eagle, Argus and then the
purpose built Hermes. The two Majestic class ships Goliath and Bulwark would be
the RN's largest and most ambitious aircraft carrier projects.
There was a second timeline presented which I also did drawings for. Instead of
building the two Nelson class, two of the Majestic type would be completed to a
modified design to save weight. That would leave only one Majestic to convert to
a carrier with an extra carrier to be built with completion 1930+.
There will also be changes to the cruisers and lesser vessels (as I think of
them) though I will try to keep the ships within RN doctrine and I will listen
to the comments as these are made. You will note the absence of the 5.25" from
my gun lists. The 4.7" is the standard destroyer weapon through to the F/G class
destroyers, when the 4.5" and 4" in dual purpose mountings and turrets take
over. The 5.5" gun only lasts about 15 years in service , no more new mountings
are produced and the twins on the G class cruisers and Mars/Jupiter class
Leaders start being replaced by the 4.5" twin dual purpose turret between
1938-39, but once war breaks out, those that have not been refitted, retain
their original armament through to the end of WW2 (one G and one Jupiter may get
a Lend/Lease rebuilding in the US in 1941).
With the older capital ships I will try to have both an original drawing (as
completed) and a drawing as they appeared in WW2.
As with other threads (and to give a comparison), I though it a good idea to
weigh out the battleships.
5 x Queen Elizabeth = 5 x 28,000 = 140,000 tons
5 x Royal Sovereign = 5 x 28,000 = 140,000 tons
3 x Barfleur = 3 x 32,000 = 96,000 tons
1 x Majestic = 1 x 40,000 = 40,000 tons
Total = 465,000 tons
+ 2 Nelsons/Majestics = 2 x 35,000/40,000 = 70-80,000 tons
Grand Total = 500,000 tons. near enough.
Battleships / Battlecruisers. | |||
HMS Neptune (TS/CVE/ADV) | 5 | 1909 | UK-3, AU-2 |
HMSAS Rhodesia (ex Lion-BC) | 2 | 1912 | SA-2 |
HMAS Marlborough (ex-Iron Duke-BB) | 6 | 1913/14 | AU-4, SA-2 |
HMAS Kimberley (ex Tiger) | 2 | 1914 | AU-2 |
HMSAS Natal (ex Erin) | 1 | 1914 | SA-1 |
HMAS New South Wales (ex Canada) | 1 | 1915 | AU-1 |
HMS Courageous (BC-13.5" & 15") | 2 | 1915 | UK-2 |
HMS Queen Elizabeth (BB) | 8 | 1915 | UK-5, AU-3 |
HMS Revenge (CVE?) | 5 | 1916-17 | UK-5 |
HMS Barfleur (BB) | 3 | 1917-18 | UK-3 |
HMAS Australis (BC) | 1 | 1919 | AU-1 |
HMS Majestic (BB) | 4 | 1920 | UK-4 |
HMSAS Transvaal (BB) | 1 | 1923 | SA-1 |
HMSAS Sud Afrika (BC) | 1 | 1936 | SA-1 |
HMS King George V (BB) | 12 | 1939-43 | UK-8-10, AU-2-4 |
HMS Vanguard (BB) | 3 | 1940 | UK-1-3 |
HMS Vengeance (BB) | 3 | 1941-42 | AU-1, UK-2 |
HMAS Oceania (BB) | 1 | 1945 | AU-1 |
Aircraft Carriers | |||
HMS Neptune CVE | 1 | 1911 | UK-1 |
HMS Revenge (CVE?) | 5 | 1916-17 | UK-5 |
HMS Argus |
1 |
1919 |
UK-1 |
HMS Hermes |
1 |
1925 |
UK-1 |
HMAS Carpentaria |
1 |
1926 |
AU-1 |
HMS Eagle |
1 |
1924 |
SA-1 |
HMAS Van Diemen |
1 |
1928 |
AU-1 |
HMS Goliath/Albion | 1-2 | 1928 | UK-1/2 |
HMSAS Lesotho |
1 |
1931 |
SA-1 |
HMS Apollo | 1 | 1932 | UK-1 |
HMAS Albatross (CVE) |
34 |
1934 |
AU-10, UK-24 |
HMS Ark Royal |
4 |
1938+ |
UK3 SA-1 |
HMS Andania | 6 | 1921-40 | UK-6 |
HMS Albatross (CVL) |
10 |
1940 |
UK-6 |
HMS Illustrious |
5 |
1940 |
UK-5 |
HMAS Endeavour |
4 |
1941 |
AU-4 |
HMS Unicorn / HMAS Tasman | 16 | 1942 | UK-AU |
HMS Indefatigable/Malta |
2 |
1944-45 |
UK-4 |
Cruisers (Heavy, Light, Anti-Aircraft, Armoured) | |||
Birmingham | 6 | 1914 | AU-4/UK-2 |
Arethusa | 11 | 1914 | AU-4/SA-3/UK-4 |
Caroline | 14 | 1915 | SA-2/UK-12 |
Caledon | 17 | 1917 | AU-4, SA-1, UK-12 |
Danae | 8 | 1918 | UK-8 |
Emerald | 4 | 1924 | AU-2/UK-2 |
Dunedin | 2 | 1923 | AU-2 |
Frobisher | 4 | 1923+ | UK-4 |
HMS Cornwall (CA) | 20 | 1928+ | AU-4, SA-2, UK-14 |
HMS Leopard (CA) | 2 | 1934 | UK-2 |
Leander | 14 | 1935 | AU-4/UK-8/SA-4 |
Newcastle | 34 | 1937+ | AU-4/CA-2/UK-28 |
Angola | 6 | 1938+ | SA-6 |
Melbourne | 4 | 1940 | AU-4 |
Dido | 19 | 1940+ | UK-19 |
Mount Perry | 30 | 1939 | AU-24/SA-6 |
HMS Lancaster (CA) | 4 | 1940-41 | UK-4 |
Princess Royal | 6 | 1941 | AU-2/UK-4 |
Area Defence Vessels | |||
Lord Nelson |
2 | 1908 | AU-1/UK-1 |
Botswana |
1 | 1908 | SA-1 |
Brabant |
2 | 1909 | AU-2 |
Duke of Edinburgh |
4 | 1908 | UK-4 |
Tasmania |
2 | 1912 | AU-2 |
St Vincent |
2 | 1910 | UK-2 |
Neptune |
2 | 1913 | AU-2 |
Pegasus | 1 |
1914 |
UK-1 |
Wildebeest |
1 | 1935 | SA-1 |