IJN Kii (CV-1927)
Return to Japanese Navy page:
The Japanese had planned, with their 8x8 building program, to be one of the
three major naval powers of the world. The Washington Treaty cut the Japanese
back to what they considered as a second rate naval power. Whether they knew it
or not, the Washington Treaty saved the Japanese expending billions of yen on
what would have shortly been obsolete warships. The two classes laid down first
in the 8x8 series were the four Amagi Class battlecruisers and the four Tosa
class battleships. The Japanese were still building separate types where the
rest of the world were going for "Fast Battleships" in their new designs. The
next two ships laid down were the first pair of the Kii class fast battleships.
Magnificent ships, they had a blend of speed, armour, and armament their
predecessors only had two/thirds of. Washington swung his mighty axe and eight
of the ten ships needed to be scrapped. This would cost the Japanese millions of
yen they had already invested in the eight ships to be scrapped. What saved the
last two hulls from the scrapyard, was the proviso in the Treaty that two hulls
could be converted to ships to operate fixed wheel aircraft (termed aircraft
carriers, CV designation). The Japanese originally chose the two Amagi class
battlecruisers as they had had the most work done on them and would be closest
to completion. Shortly after this decision, both of the ships were damaged in an
earthquake. The Japanese Navy decided that all of the original eight ships would
be scrapped, and they would use the two Kii class ships to build the new
aircraft carriers from.
Swapping to the Kii hulls meant that completion went from 1925 out to 1927.
Armament ideas changed from one design to the next. The Washington treaty
allowed aircraft carriers to carry up to 8" guns. The Japanese Navy designers
were told one day to fit 8" guns, the next 5.5" then only 4.7" AA. The Navy was
not certain as to what would be the ships major opponent. Cruisers would require
8" guns on the carriers to keep them at bay. Destroyers and their torpedoes
would need 5.5" guns to fend them off and keep them out of torpedo range. If a
battleship, battlecruiser, came within range then they would be toast. The
simplest method was to leave the 5.5" gun deck in place from the original
battleship design and accept that anything bigger than destroyers would have to
be handled by the ships escorts. A set of six, 4.7" AA guns, was fitted for
barrage work, while eight 13.2mm machine guns would do the close in AA work. The
original 12" armoured belt was removed and replaced with a 4.7" one. This
matched the 4.7" deck armour and gave a useful set of armour protection.
The triple take off area at the bow was a problem from day one. It looked
excellent on paper, launch three aircraft at a time, but in practice the middle
launching deck was too short for aircraft with any sort of load. The three decks
had to be in constant communication so that mid-air collisions could be avoided
during takeoff. Which leads on to command and control functions. A bridge
structure was trialed on the Hosho, but on the advice of senior aircrew, was
removed. The British had both in the Furious/Glorious types and fitted a bridge
to the Furious as they had proved that putting your command functions in one
place was superior to having them spread out. While the Japanese may have been
annoyed with the British and U.S., up till 1930 they would be granted access to
non-secret things. Whether a bridge superstructure worked on a carrier or not
would certainly be information that would be shared. The three years from
completion till 1930 would certainly have been enough time to find out about
whether the three deck take off system worked or not. It didn't, so it came down
to when would the system have been replaced and a full hangar and flight deck be
installed. My feeling would be that the changes would have had to be made before
the 'Kate' bomber came into service as it would need all the help it could get.
The refits would be completed late 1937.
The massive 1936-37 refit was undertaken to right many of the wrongs that the
first 10 years of aircraft operations had shown needed to be fixed. The major
work to be done was, fix the triple deck by removing it and replacing it with
hangar space. The Japanese had taken note of the Hermes and the US Lexington
with their enclosed bows, and would fit the same to the Kii and Owari. The 5.5"
guns were taken out and the gun deck plated over and turned into more
accommodation spaces. The new command center and bridge superstructure would be
fitted forward of the funnel, but the funnel arrangement would be left the same.
The aft hangar areas would also be extended. The single 4.7" would be removed
and replaced with twin 5" AA guns. The first 25mm would be fitted in twin and
single mountings. These weapons would increase in numbers until both ships had
been sunk. This is the main version that would fight the early battles of the
Second World War.
Now I remember why I am not that fond of overhead drawings. That 1939 post
rebuilding drawing took ages. Still not sure if I lined everything up properly.
Went cross-eyed trying to check.
Displacement | 38,800 tons std, 45,550 tons full load (40,250 std, 47,500 full) | |
Length | 869 feet, (888 ft overall after rebuilding) | |
Breadth | 109 feet (hull) | |
Draught | 31 ft | |
Machinery | 4 shaft Steam turbines, 135,000shp | |
Speed | 30 knots | |
Range | 10,000 miles at 18 knots | |
Armour | 4.7" side, 4.7" main deck | |
Armament | 1927-1938 12 x 5.5" (12x1) 6 x 4.7" (6x1) 8 x 13.2mm (8x1) |
1939-1942 12 x 5" (6x2) 48 x 25 mm (16x3)
|
Aircraft | 100 (75 assembled, 25 CKD) as at 1927-39 (110) 100 internal 10 deck park | |
Complement | 2200 | |
Notes | IJN Kii IJN Owari 3 scrapped 4 scrapped |
Building the Kii.